Florida's Kids Social Media Law HB 3 bans children under 14 from having accounts on certain social media platforms and requires parental consent for many 14–15‑year‑olds. 

After a recent federal appeals court ruling, the state can now enforce the law while the constitutional fight continues, making this one of the most important online-safety issues for Tampa Bay families.
 

HB 3 targets platforms with features like infinite scroll, autoplay, notifications, and other engagement tools that lawmakers say are addictive for minors. 

The law also forces covered platforms to implement age-verification and content controls, reshaping how kids and parents in Florida access Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, and similar sites.

Key rules under HB 3

• Children under 14 are not allowed to open accounts on covered social media platforms under HB 3. 
   
• Fourteen- and fifteen‑year‑olds can have accounts only with verified parental or guardian consent. 
   
• Platforms must use reasonable age‑verification methods, delete underage accounts within a set time frame, and restrict minors from accessing content labeled harmful to minors. 
   

The law defines which platforms are covered by focusing on interactive, user‑to‑user public communication rather than naming specific apps, but court filings point to sites such as Instagram, Snapchat, Facebook, and YouTube as likely examples. Streaming services that primarily deliver one‑way content without public comment threads are generally treated differently, a distinction that has become part of the constitutional debate.

Why this law is controversial
 

Supporters argue HB 3 is a necessary response to mounting evidence that heavy social media use can worsen anxiety, depression, sleep problems, and exposure to bullying and explicit content in children and teens. They say design choices like endless feeds, push notifications, and algorithmic recommendations keep kids online longer than they intend, with little meaningful parental control.
 

Opponents, including major tech-industry groups, claim HB 3 violates the First Amendment and will chill lawful speech for both minors and adults by forcing identity checks and limiting access to lawful content. Civil liberties advocates say age‑verification systems risk over‑collecting sensitive data and may deter users from engaging in political, religious, or personal conversations online.

Current legal status of HB3: 

HB 3 is currently enforced but still in court.
 

HB 3 passed during Florida’s 2024 legislative session and took effect in 2025, immediately drawing a federal lawsuit from industry associations representing companies like Google, Meta, and Snap. A federal district judge initially blocked enforcement with a preliminary injunction, finding that the law likely infringed free‑speech rights.
 

In late 2025, however, a divided panel of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals allowed Florida to enforce the law while the underlying constitutional case proceeds, calling the restrictions “content neutral” in the majority opinion. One judge dissented, describing the statute as “plainly unconstitutional” and warning that mandatory age verification for all users would significantly chill protected speech.

What this means for Florida parents and teens
 

For Florida families, including those we serve in Tampa, St. Petersburg, Clearwater, and surrounding communities, the immediate impact is practical: under‑14 children should not have accounts on covered platforms, and 14–15‑year‑olds need documented parental approval. 

Parents should expect more age‑verification prompts, new consent flows, and notices from social media companies about account reviews and deletions for suspected underage users.
 

Local schools and youth programs will likely see more questions from families about what online activities are still allowed, how school‑managed platforms fit into the law, and what happens when a student’s personal account is flagged. Tampa Bay mental‑health professionals, pediatricians, and family‑law attorneys may also encounter more clients asking whether screen‑time disputes, account shutdowns, or alleged violations of HB 3 affect parenting plans and custody issues.

Practical steps for compliance and safety

• Audit your child’s apps: List every platform your child uses and identify which ones have public posting, DMs, infinite scroll, or autoplay features that likely bring them under HB 3. 
   
• Confirm ages and permissions: For kids approaching 14, decide in advance whether you will authorize any social media use and under what conditions, documenting your consent where platforms request it. 
   
• Tighten privacy and monitoring: Use built‑in parental controls, device‑level restrictions, and clear family rules on screen time, while explaining to teens why some accounts may be removed or limited under the new law. 
   

Parents should also watch for phishing or scams disguised as “age verification” and only share sensitive information through official platform channels, not links from unexpected messages. Where platforms offer less intrusive verification methods, such as third‑party age‑estimation tools that minimize data retention, those may offer a safer balance between compliance and privacy.

Florida is one of the earliest and most aggressive states to regulate minors’ social media use.

For questions or concerns about Florida kids social media law HB 3, we offer a free consultation and detailed case evaluation.