Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming the legal landscape across the country, and
Florida is at the forefront of this shift. From law firms integrating AI into legal research and contract review to courts piloting new AI tools in case management and e-filing systems, the state is actively embracing innovation while grappling with its ethical boundaries.
This article outlines how AI is being used in Florida’s legal industry, explores regulatory updates and risks, and recaps the recent “Judicial Perspectives on Technology and AI in the Courtroom” panel that took place in Boca Raton.
How Florida Law Firms Are Using AI Tools
Florida law firms are leveraging generative AI to improve workflow efficiency, particularly in these key areas:
- Legal research: Summarizing large volumes of case law and statutes
- Contract analysis: Reviewing clauses, detecting risks, and suggesting redlines
- Document drafting:
Writing motions, pleadings, and client letters
- Deposition prep: Analyzing transcripts and generating summaries
Ethical compliance remains a top concern. The Florida Bar issued Ethics Opinion 24-1 and amended Rules 4-1.1 (Competence) and 4-1.6 (Confidentiality) to clarify how attorneys must maintain oversight when using AI.
These updates emphasize that attorneys must:
- Understand the technology they use
- Protect client confidentiality
- Verify all AI-generated content for accuracy
- AI in the
Florida Courtroom: Realities and Risks
How Florida Courts Are Using AI Tools
Florida courts, guided by the Florida Courts Technology Commission, are exploring AI to:
- Streamline case filings
- Support judges with scheduling and workflow tools
- Automate form generation and data
synchronization
Disciplinary Trends
Several recent cases have highlighted the dangers of over-reliance on AI.
- Lawyers have been sanctioned for submitting AI-generated briefs with fabricated citations.
- A Florida federal judge recently fined an attorney for
failing to verify the authenticity of AI-generated case law.
Judges have emphasized that AI tools are only acceptable when their outputs are validated by a
human legal professional.
Boca Raton Judicial Panel Recap: Judicial Perspectives on Technology and AI
In June 2025, the Florida Bar hosted its annual technology symposium in Boca Raton. One of the most anticipated sessions was the judicial panel titled:
"Judicial Perspectives on Technology and AI in the Courtroom"
Panelists included:
- Justice John D. Couriel (FL Supreme Court)
- Judge Walter Havers (20th Judicial Circuit)
- Judge Hunter Carroll (12th Judicial Circuit)
- Judge Thomas Palermo (13th Judicial Circuit)
Key Insights:
- Judges are cautiously testing AI for administrative efficiencies but stress that human oversight must always guide
decisions.
- Justice Couriel warned of "AI hallucinations" and stressed that AI only predicts desired text, not truth.
- Judge Havers discussed AI's role in Zoom-based mediation and digital filings, noting both promise and limitations.
The session also emphasized professional responsibility. AI is a tool, not a decision-maker.
CLE credits awarded: 4.0 general, 2.5 ethics, 4.0 technology hours.
Ethical Considerations and Best Practices
AI introduces new challenges in legal ethics, including:
- Hallucinated cases: At least 95 court incidents involved fake AI citations in
the past year.
- Bias concerns: Unchecked algorithms could reflect data-driven prejudices.
- Confidentiality risks: Public AI tools may store or learn from sensitive inputs.
Recommended Best Practices:
- Disclose AI use when appropriate
- Always verify legal citations manually
- Use private or local AI models for client work
- Stay current on state bar guidance and judicial rulings
National Frameworks and Florida’s Leading Role
Florida's clear ethical rules and proactive judiciary have positioned it as a model for other jurisdictions:
- Ethics Opinion 24-1 aligns with broader guidance from the ABA and Sedona Conference.
- Judges in Florida are participating in pilot programs to responsibly integrate AI tools into public-facing court operations.
- Legal educators
in the state are preparing law students for AI collaboration as part of professional competence.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is AI legal to use in court filings in Florida?
Yes, but only if the AI-generated content is reviewed, verified, and submitted under an attorney's direct supervision. Fake citations or misused tools can lead to sanctions.
Q: What ethical rules apply to lawyers using AI in Florida?
Lawyers must comply with Rules 4-1.1 (Competence), 4-1.6 (Confidentiality), and follow Ethics Opinion 24-1 regarding generative AI.
Q: What happened at the Boca Raton judicial panel on AI?
Judges shared real-world use cases and concerns, emphasizing accuracy, ethical risks, and the need for careful implementation.
Q: Are Florida courts themselves using AI?
Yes, in limited pilots—mostly in case flow management and e-filing automation. Judicial decision-making remains fully human.
Q: Can AI help my law firm be more efficient?
Yes. AI can reduce time spent on research, drafting, and review—as long as attorneys supervise its use carefully.
AI is here to stay in Florida
law. The key is balance - embracing innovation while upholding professional responsibility and ethical practice. With clear bar rules, an informed judiciary, and growing practical experience, Florida is paving the way for how legal systems nationwide can responsibly adopt AI.
